What industry do you work in and what is your role?
What are your responses in your role / position?
Can you describe to the function of your workplace / company?
How many departments, how many offices. National or International?
What are the minimum requirements for employment ie Education or Experience?
How many opportunities are there to ‘move up the ladder’?
What is the process for changing job roles ie Interview? Test?
————————————————– —— ——————————————————General discussion about your workweek:
Current projects? Deadlines? Opportunities?
Anything of interest happening?
————————————————————————————————————Article
1.
Over the weekend, 23-year-old tennis superstar Naomi Osaka announced she was withdrawing from the French Open. This news came about a week after Osaka stated on social media that she would be avoiding the press at this tournament, asserting that the nature of press conferences is harmful to athletes and that “people have no regard for athletes’ mental health.”
2.
She said, “I believe that the whole situation is kicking a person while they’re down and I don’t understand the reasoning behind it.” Unsurprisingly, Osaka’s initial announcement was met with mixed reactions from the general public, the media, and fellow tennis colleagues, many of whom thought she was overreacting.
3.
She was called spoiled and entitled, with most of the critics pointing out that doing press is part of her job and her contractual obligations—as well as the contractual obligations of every other athlete.
What has been the reception to this news domestically / internationally?
4.
After this, the world’s top tennis organizations responded with a $15,000 fine and a joint statement. The beginning of the statement reinforces their “commitment to all athletes’ well-being,” affirming that “the mental health of players competing in our tournaments and on the Tours is of the utmost importance to the Grand Slams.”
5.
However, the statement goes on to say the following: “We have advised Naomi Osaka that should she continue to ignore her media obligations during the tournament, she would be exposing herself to possible further Code of Conduct infringement consequences.
6.
As might be expected, repeat violations attract tougher sanctions including default from the tournament (Code of Conduct article III T.) and the trigger of a major offence investigation that could lead to more substantial fines and future Grand Slam suspensions (Code of Conduct article IV A.3.).”
What do you think Ms.Osaka is trying to achieve, do you think it will work?
– What alternatives (if any) do you believe would be more successful?
– Why do you think she chose to protest in this way?
7.
At this point, Osaka was in a less-than-ideal situation. The concerns she expressed about her mental health were not only met with criticism from her peers, but they were also met with threats to exclude her from the four major tennis tournaments—communicated directly from the leaders of those tournaments themselves. But she handled the situation with grace, humility, and self-respect. Here’s what we can all learn from Osaka’s actions throughout the past week.
Stand your ground.
8.
Osaka could have succumbed to the criticism and the threats. She could have just done the press conferences anyway, putting herself through the emotional stress and pressure that she has clearly stated are deeply harmful to her mental health.
Who (individuals or groups/professions) do you think are treated the most unfairly in the media, why do you think so?
